> ------------------------------
>
> From: "A.N.Kuznetsov" <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 20:06:14 +0300
> Subject: Re: Too Much ARP-ing
>
> In article <199701270218.VAA09752@delta.CES.CWRU.Edu> you wrote:
>
> : This is a typical scenario from tcpdump -p (my machine is jeff):
> : 15:30:37.455806 arp who-has hunny.INS.CWRU.Edu tell ins02055.INS.CWRU.Edu
> : 15:30:37.455806 arp who-has ins02055.INS.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com
> : 16:27:55.025806 arp who-has hunny.INS.CWRU.Edu tell b64471.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu
> : 16:27:55.025806 arp who-has b64471.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com
> : 16:27:55.325806 arp who-has rabbit.INS.CWRU.Edu tell b62701.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu
> : 16:27:55.325806 arp who-has b62701.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu tell jeff.krafty.com
>
> : Is this behavior normal?
>
> It depends on your setup.
>
> Do you use net aliases on this ethernet? If you do you will have to suffer.
> net_aliases are broken in 2.0.
>
I'm a non-techie running Linux v2.0.27 but I noticed that when using
IP-aliases,
route add -host xx.xx.xx.xx eth0:0
my win95 host complained about eth0 hw address conflict, and ifconfig
having the same eth0 hw address as the gateway host.
Could this be a hw address conflict?
danny ow