Re: Good point of Linux over Windows NT

Michael Neuffer (neuffer@nomis.i-Connect.Net)
Mon, 20 Jan 1997 13:43:31 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Good point of Linux over Windows NT"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"
In reply to: Trevor Johnson: "Re: 2.1.21: unable to mount root fs"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"

On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Fritz Heinrichmeyer wrote:

>
> In the german CT computer magazin (1/97) there is a weakness of NT mentioned
> (concerning File-IO) which lets look NT 4.0 as software in a Pre-Alpha
> release status.

What do you expect from a x.0 release from M$ ?

Mike

Michael Neuffer i-Connect.Net, a Division of iConnect Corp.
mike@i-Connect.Net 14355 SW Allen Blvd., Suite 140
503.641.8774 Beaverton, OR 97005

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Good point of Linux over Windows NT"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"
In reply to: Trevor Johnson: "Re: 2.1.21: unable to mount root fs"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"
Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: setsockopt() and SO_RCVTIMEO (2.1.21)"