Re: NT vulnerable to attack on CPU

Mark H. Wood (mwood@mhw.oit.iupui.edu)
Sat, 28 Dec 1996 09:56:41 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew G. Morgan: "Re: signing a filesystem"
Previous message: Mark Hemment: "Re: link(2) creates hard link to symlink in some cases"

On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, jamesh wrote:
[deletia]
> You can tell your NT friend; Nice Try - maby Next Time - Not Today...
Aw, gee whiz -- it's just an off-by-one bug. The process in question
shouldn't be able to raise its priority above *15*, not *16*. Then the
other processes would get some time when they get boosted.

My last words here on this, since it isn't about Linux....

Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer MWOOD@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU
Those who will not learn from history are doomed to reimplement it.

Next message: Andrew G. Morgan: "Re: signing a filesystem"
Previous message: Mark Hemment: "Re: link(2) creates hard link to symlink in some cases"