I think I'm very well understanding Unix file system semantics.
maybe I should have asked "what's the real benefit or reason to allow..."
or similar instead.
I can only see drawbacks in allowing this (same as that SYSV allowing
Joe U. to change the owner of his own files to any other user)
giving a number of problem and risks and no real use at all.
which possible good application am I missing ?
> One point remains, though: By making a hard link to a file, Joe A. User
> can make a file exist on a file system much longer than the owner of the
> file might expect.
this is a major problem esp. if you're using quotas and even more if Jim B.
has to pay for disk space (very expensive at the csd of your university:(
and Joe A. keeps hard links of your files in his own directories...
also you can change access policies to files (and not only to a copy
of the file) using hard links when access to the original directory
isn't possible for user/group B but Joe U. creates a hard link to this
file in a directory tree with different access rights...
Harald
-- All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____ be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\ 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\ \ \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\ \ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|// Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \ koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ^^^^^ ^^^^^