>> > Congratulations, and we're all waiting for a new male version (perhaps
>> > v2.1? nah, it's gotta be 2.2 at least) :-))
>Why is it called "male"? If you happen to be making a refrence to the
>stable kernels being "male" and the unstable ones being "female", I'd like
oh, may be thats simply because we love development kernels as much as we
love women? :)
2nb.