Re: Shell-Script problems

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@noris.de)
8 Dec 1996 08:51:31 +0100

In linux.dev.kernel, article <Pine.LNX.3.95.961207163908.3415C-100000@moisil.wal.rhno.columbia.edu>,
Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.wal.rhno.columbia.edu> writes:
>
> The changes are trivial, but before changing anything I'd like to hear
> what other people think about this issue - whether the name of the process
> as appears in /proc/<pid>/stat should be the name of the interpreter (for
> compatibility reasons) or the name of the interpreted script.
>
The latter.

> --- linux/fs/binfmt_script.c.old Sat Dec 7 20:47:27 1996
> +++ linux/fs/binfmt_script.c Sat Dec 7 20:47:32 1996
> @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@
> /*
> * OK, now restart the process with the interpreter's inode.
> */
> - bprm->filename = interp;
> retval = open_namei(interp, 0, 0, &bprm->inode, NULL);
> if (retval)
> return retval;
>
Uh, what? This is already gone in 2.0.27.

-- 
Department meeting in 3 minutes.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs         \  noris network GmbH  /  Xlink-POP Nürnberg 
Schleiermacherstraße 12   \   Linux+Internet   /   EMail: urlichs@noris.de
90491 Nürnberg (Germany)   \    Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'ing
   PGP: 1024/4F578875   1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44  15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE
       Click <A HREF="http://info.noris.de/~smurf/finger">here</A>.    42