Re: PNP patch into kernel when?

Philip Blundell (pjb27@cam.ac.uk)
Thu, 5 Dec 1996 21:25:06 +0000 (GMT)


On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:

> I think this squashes all the complaints put forward so far.
> If not, please remind me.

I've just been looking at the PnP patch in slightly more detail. Is there
any chance you could use a slightly more conventional layout style? I
find that function definitions laid out as

/*
* Find an empty region entry.
*/
static hwres_entry_t * find_empty
(
void
)
{
int i;
...
}

are a bit visually jarring, and they don't match any other part of the
kernel that I know of. Since I imagine many people may want to work on
the resource manager, it seems polite to stick to the standard coding
style.

phil