Re: PNP patch into kernel when?

Andrew E. Mileski (aem@nic.ott.hookup.net)
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 16:09:15 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew E. Mileski: "AHA-1540 Programming"
Previous message: White_Dragon: "2.1.14 Won't compile, eep, =/"
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"

> > One thing that crossed my mind...hasn't module compatibility _already_
> > been broken because of the v2.1.* changes? (I don't know, so I'm asking.)
>
> Yes.

Okay, then everyone can stop picking on the changes proposed by the PnP
patch :*) Is this a good enough reason in support of the changes?
I think it is - separately maintained modules are already broken, so the
proposed PnP patch changes are moot.

Are there any other objections to the proposed changes?

--
Andrew E. Mileski   mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net
Linux Plug-and-Play Kernel Project http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pnp/
XFree86 Matrox Team http://www.bf.rmit.edu.au/~ajv/xf86-matrox.html

Next message: Andrew E. Mileski: "AHA-1540 Programming"
Previous message: White_Dragon: "2.1.14 Won't compile, eep, =/"
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"