> we could require use of pgp and send only encrypted mail
> to subscribers. We would produce a message
> readable by everyone on the list (possible with pgp...
> dunno how much time it would take to encrypt a 4kB
> mail for ... 1000 recipients (realistic?))
[...]
> any comment ?
I read this through a local caltech mail-to-news gateway, so I see it
as news, which would make the PGP scheme inconvenient at best, and
unworkable (for me) at worst, unless I really subscribe separately...
then again, I'm mostly a voiceless lurker...
$0.02
- M
P.S. I wonder if posting from here is set up right; I'll be interested
to see what the headers say about the path this message takes...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mark "Monty" Montague | monty@gg.caltech.edu | I don't do Windows(tm)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
DON'T PANIC! I'm a trained professional, and far more | *Why* question
qualified to panic in this situation than you are. | authority?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-