Re: 2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c

Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de)
30 Jul 1996 21:11:40 GMT


Dr. Werner Fink (werner@suse.de) wrote:

: what's wrong with the patch for fs/isofs/inode.c done in 2.0.9?
: The patch was given by Bernhard Kaindl for CDs with multibe sessions.

We can trust the returned multisession redirection value only if
xa_flag is set, as we see now. I know why I had commented it in
cdrom.h this way.
If a drive does not recognize a multisession disk as an XA disk
(necessary, says the yellow book), it is up to the driver to do
decisions which allow to fake the xa_flag or not. It is safe to
say "no XA disk" (so, only the first session is visible). No driver
should fake "yes, XA disk" without research.

Cheers -e

-- 
Eberhard Moenkeberg                         GGG   W   W  DDDD    GGG
                                           G      W   W  D   D  G
E-Mail:   emoenke@gwdg.de                  G GGG  W   W  D   D  G GGG
Phone: +49 551 2011551  Fax: +49 551 21119 G   G  W W W  D   D  G   G
SnailMail:                                  GGG   WW WW  DDDD    GGG
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH
Am Fassberg, D-37077 Goettingen, GERMANY
At home: Modem+ISDN ("guest") ++49-551-7704102, ISDN-HDLC 7704103