Re: SCSI device numbering (was: Re: Ideas for v2.1

Bryn Paul Arnold Jones (bpaj@gytha.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 23 Jun 1996 00:24:38 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bryn Paul Arnold Jones: "Re: Drawbacks of implementing undelete entirely in user space"
Previous message: Aaron Ucko: "possible SCSI device numbering solution"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: SCSI device numbering (was: Re: Ideas for v2.1"

On Sat, 22 Jun 1996 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
[...]
> On the other hand, not many C compilers support long long, so a 64-bit
> dev_t would limit us to gcc. I don't know whether that would be a
> problem for anybody.
>
> Andries
>
I think we're stuck with gcc anyway so ...
Bryn

--
PGP key pass phrase forgotten,   \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence 
again :(                          |            initiated.
                                 / This space is intentionally left   
                                |  blank, apart from this text ;-)
                                 \____________________________________

Next message: Bryn Paul Arnold Jones: "Re: Drawbacks of implementing undelete entirely in user space"
Previous message: Aaron Ucko: "possible SCSI device numbering solution"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: SCSI device numbering (was: Re: Ideas for v2.1"