Re: diald-0.14-1 ?

Ray Curtis (ray@fred.net)
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:06:10 -0400


>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Schenk <schenk@cs.toronto.edu> writes:

Eric> Ray Curtis <ray@fred.net> writes:
>> I'm using Kernel Version 2.0 and ppp-2.2.0f-1 along with diald-0.14-1
>> and have just noticed that the routing seems wrong. Everything seems
>> to be working, however I this is what I get. Does anyone have any
>> idea's why I show (3) ppp0 lines and (2) default lines ?
>>
>> This is with link up:
>>
>> netstat -r
>> Kernel routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>> bigdog.fred.net * 255.255.255.255 UH 500 0 1 ppp0
>> bigdog.fred.net * 255.255.255.255 UH 2000 0 3 sl0
>> portmaster2.fre * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
>> loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
>> default * 0.0.0.0 U 500 0 0 ppp0
>> default bigdog.fred.net 0.0.0.0 UG 2000 0 6 sl0

Eric> <Explanation Deleted>

Thanks Eric, for taking the time to explain why this happens. I assume
that you will be making some changes to the next upgrade of Diald,
that is not to say this version is bad, otherwise I think it's great.
The one change I would like to see or be able to do is somehow to be
able to know the connect speed of each connection, is this possible ?

Also, has the address for Diald changed from:
linux-diald@vger.rutgers.edu
to
t00fri@x4u.desy.de

I got this message when I sent the last message to the list:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sender,
we are sorry, that your mail could not be delivered
to the specified user. The user account has been
deleted from this cluster.

Please send future mails to the following address:

t00fri@x4u.desy.de

With kindly regards
The DESY Computer Center

--------------------------------------------------------------------
** When you can keep your head and all about are losing theirs...
maybe you just don't understand the situation **

__ _
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __ Linux Host 'Ray'
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / Ray Curtis
/____/_/_//_/\___/ /_/\_\ e-mail: ray@fred.net