Re: Is it "stable" or "experimental"?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 16 Jun 1996 15:19:25 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: really kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: BEWARE! Linux seteuid is broken!"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: route add -net failure at boot"
In reply to: James Hughes: "Re: Tux The Penguin Is Gonna Get Medieval On Yo' Ass =)"
Next in thread: Bruce Murphy: "Re: Tux The Penguin Is Gonna Get Medieval On Yo' Ass =)"

> If 2.0 is stable, why does the make config script still have a question
> about experimental drivers? If this is REALLY stable, should there be any
> experimental drivers in the configuration? Or am I missing something very
> basic?

Type "?" at the question about experimental drivers and read the documentation
it then provides.

Alan

Next message: really kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: BEWARE! Linux seteuid is broken!"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: route add -net failure at boot"
In reply to: James Hughes: "Re: Tux The Penguin Is Gonna Get Medieval On Yo' Ass =)"
Next in thread: Bruce Murphy: "Re: Tux The Penguin Is Gonna Get Medieval On Yo' Ass =)"