Re: For 2.1 : Painful but I think needed

David S. Miller (dm@neteng.engr.sgi.com)
Thu, 13 Jun 1996 11:10:41 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Neuffer: "Re: rationale behind /proc filesystem? (wuz Re: 2.0, loggings....)"
Previous message: Richard Henderson: "ppp problems with 2.0.0"
Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "For 2.1 : Painful but I think needed"

Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 13:38:45 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>

Anyone in the "non intel" architecture camp with similar needs that
mean this isnt the right solution ?

It will neither help nor hinder the Sparc stuff, but may be needed for
various MIPS SMP ports. So go ahead, the mechanism/interface looks
fine to me ;)

Later,
David S. Miller
dm@sgi.com

Next message: Michael Neuffer: "Re: rationale behind /proc filesystem? (wuz Re: 2.0, loggings....)"
Previous message: Richard Henderson: "ppp problems with 2.0.0"
Maybe in reply to: Alan Cox: "For 2.1 : Painful but I think needed"