No doubt.
> Will 2.1 be as hectic and interesting as 2.0 ?
More so...2.0 isn't supposed to be hectic.
Now, 2.1 will probably be just as much fun as 1.3.
> I know about IPv6, POSIX.6. I know about XXXX support in the kernel, which
> will not happen, will happen in part or will provoke a fission in Linux
> development. What else ?
I think IPv6 is _definitely_ going to make it for 2.1.
It's moving _very_ quickly.
> NFSv3 ?
Probably.
> ATM ? (I know W. Almesberger is working on it)
Hope so.
I think the Linux net code can handle AAL-4 speeds now, but Alan'll
correct me if I'm wrong.
> Linux on SGI boxes ?
> VGER running Linux and working perfectly :) ?
Yup on both counts, or davem will die trying. =)
Mike
-- #> Mike Shaver (shaver@ingenia.com) Ingenia Communications Corporation <# #> Chief System Architect -- Head geek -- System exorcist <# #> <# #> "Have you considered a life? I hear they're quite affordable <# #> these days." --- shields@tembel.org <#