Re: No atime

Stephen R. van den Berg (srb@cuci.nl)
Wed, 5 Jun 1996 03:41:16 +0200


Erik Corry <erik@kroete2.freinet.de> wrote:
>I'd like to point out to those who say 'Posix at any price' that:

>a) It's only a mount option + a very small patch - you don't have to use it.
>b) NFS isn't Posix-conforming either, but it's a very useful filesystem.

What a fuss about an option. It's useful, it doesn't break anything
(unless you use it) and it is small. The question is not if it gets
in. The question is more likely to be *how* does it get in.

The only gripe about the current patch is that it uses the word:

no_atime

instead of

noatime

The latter seems to be the standard naming convention for all
other no- attributes.

-- 
Sincerely,                                                          srb@cuci.nl
           Stephen R. van den Berg (AKA BuGless).

A truly wise man never plays leapfrog with a unicorn.