Re: memory

Joseph Dickson (
Tue, 07 May 1996 18:00:03 -0400

On Sun, 05 May 1996 20:12:13 +0200, Alain Knaff writes:
> Probably they meant that Linux' buffer cache is more efficient than
>_caching disk controllers_ . Which is true. However, you still need to
>have a decent amount of SRAM memory cache. Just don't put it on your
>IDE controller :)
> Alain

I get significant performance increases with a caching IDE controller...
they are well worth the money IMO.. :P