Re: extended partitions

Todd Larason (jtl@molehill.org)
Sat, 7 Oct 1995 10:59:47 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Holland: "Re: extended partitions"
Previous message: Carlos M. S. Antunes: "smbfs and ls bug?"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: extended partitions"

On Mon, 2 Oct 1995 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> 6 DOS 16-bit FAT >=32M

I was told last night that Windows 95's fdisk, when manually run from the
"single application mode" of Windows 95 (the single-floppy bootable
"looks-like-DOS-but-isn't-really" code), creates Primary DOS partitions
with partition type e instead of 6. I don't have Windows 95 and haven't
verified this.

Next message: David Holland: "Re: extended partitions"
Previous message: Carlos M. S. Antunes: "smbfs and ls bug?"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: extended partitions"