Re: netconsole: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order warning

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Fri Aug 15 2025 - 08:46:11 EST

Next message: Thomas Zimmermann: "Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/3] drm/shmem-helper: Import dmabuf without mapping its sg_table"
Previous message: Jiri Olsa: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 3/3] selftests/bpf: make usdt_o2 reliably generate SIB USDT arg spec"
In reply to: Calvin Owens: "Re: netconsole: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order warning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2025-08-14 at 17:23 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> We started hitting this a lot in the CI as well, lockdep must have
> gotten more sensitive in 6.17.

FWIW, the issues wireless lappy reported aren't merge window arrivals.
6.12.41+lockdep behaved as master, wired ran clean, wireless grumbled.

-Mike

Next message: Thomas Zimmermann: "Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/3] drm/shmem-helper: Import dmabuf without mapping its sg_table"
Previous message: Jiri Olsa: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 3/3] selftests/bpf: make usdt_o2 reliably generate SIB USDT arg spec"
In reply to: Calvin Owens: "Re: netconsole: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order warning"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]