Re: [RFC V2 11/18] famfs_fuse: Basic famfs mount opts

[John Groves]

On 25/08/14 05:19PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 16:39, John Groves <John@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Having a generic approach rather than a '-o' option would be fine with me.
> > Also happy to entertain other ideas...
> 
> We could just allow arbitrary options to be set by the server.  It
> might break cases where the server just passes unknown options down
> into the kernel, which currently are rejected.  I don't think this is
> common practice, but still it sounds a bit risky.
> 
> Alternatively allow INIT_REPLY to set up misc options, which can only
> be done explicitly, so no risk there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Miklos

I'll take a look at INIT_REPLY; if I can make sense of it, I'll try something
based on that in V3. Or I may have questions...

Thanks,
John