Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: exclude ntfs3 from file mode validation in may_open()
From: Christian Brauner
Date: Mon Aug 11 2025 - 09:50:17 EST
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 04:05:51PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Since ntfs_read_mft() not only accepts file modes which may_open() accepts
> but also accepts
>
> (fname && fname->home.low == cpu_to_le32(MFT_REC_EXTEND) &&
> fname->home.seq == cpu_to_le16(MFT_REC_EXTEND)
>
> case when the file mode is none of
> S_IFDIR/S_IFLNK/S_IFREG/S_IFCHR/S_IFBLK/S_IFIFO/S_IFSOCK, may_open() cannot
> unconditionally expect IS_ANON_FILE(inode) when the file mode is none of
> S_IFDIR/S_IFLNK/S_IFREG/S_IFCHR/S_IFBLK/S_IFIFO/S_IFSOCK.
>
> Treat as if S_IFREG when the inode is for NTFS3 filesystem.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+895c23f6917da440ed0d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=895c23f6917da440ed0d
> Fixes: af153bb63a33 ("vfs: catch invalid modes in may_open()")
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Is it possible to handle this problem on the NTFS3 side?
Ugh, this is annoying.
@Konstantin, why do you leave a zero mode for these files?
Let's just make them regular files?
>
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> @@ -470,8 +470,9 @@ static struct inode *ntfs_read_mft(struct inode *inode,
> } else if (fname && fname->home.low == cpu_to_le32(MFT_REC_EXTEND) &&
> fname->home.seq == cpu_to_le16(MFT_REC_EXTEND)) {
> /* Records in $Extend are not a files or general directories. */
> inode->i_op = &ntfs_file_inode_operations;
> + mode = S_IFREG;
> } else {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
>
> I don't know what breaks if we pretend as if S_IFREG...
>
> fs/namei.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index cd43ff89fbaa..a66599754394 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3471,6 +3471,12 @@ static int may_open(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, const struct path *path,
> return -EACCES;
> break;
> default:
> + /* Special handling for ntfs_read_mft() case. */
> + if (inode->i_sb->s_magic == 0x7366746e) {
> + if ((acc_mode & MAY_EXEC) && path_noexec(path))
> + return -EACCES;
That's really unacceptable. We either need to drop the assert which
would be a shame because it keeps finding bugs or we fix that in ntfs3
which is my preferred solution...
> + break;
> + }
> VFS_BUG_ON_INODE(!IS_ANON_FILE(inode), inode);
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1