Re: [PATCH 2/7] rust: gpu: update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted imports from sync::aref
From: Shankari Anand
Date: Thu Jul 31 2025 - 13:50:35 EST
On Thu Jul 31, 2025 at 14:54 UTC, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> Ok, did you send the other ones already? I don't see them anywhere.
The commit 07dad44aa9a9 ("rust: kernel: move ARef and AlwaysRefCounted
to sync::aref ") refers to the patch where ARef and AlwaysRefCounted
were moved into a different file. [1]
To update the call-sites accordingly, I was advised to split the
changes by subsystem so each patch could be reviewed and acked by the
respective maintainers. [2]
These patches are all part of that same effort, although they aren't
shown as a formal series since the subject lines vary to reflect the
specific files they touch. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
> NIT: Please don't top post. [1]
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions
Apologies, I’ll make sure to follow the interleaved style.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=07dad44aa9a93b16af19e8609a10b241c352b440
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72=NSRMV_6UxXVgkebmWmbgN4i=sfRszr-G+x3W5A4DYOg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716090712.809750-1-shankari.ak0208@xxxxxxxxx/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716091158.812860-1-shankari.ak0208@xxxxxxxxx/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250716091827.816971-1-shankari.ak0208@xxxxxxxxx/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250717072724.14602-1-shankari.ak0208@xxxxxxxxx/
[7] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250717073108.14943-1-shankari.ak0208@xxxxxxxxx/
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 8:24 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu Jul 31, 2025 at 3:59 PM CEST, Shankari Anand wrote:
> >> Where is the rest of the series?
> > So actually it's spread across various subsystems. I had given the
> > notation (2/7) to have a count of the patches under the same effort.
> > Apologies for the misinterpretation.
> > But yes, recently Miguel suggested discontinuing using the notation
> > but as I had sent the patch long back, I didn't resend it.
> >
> > If it is confusing, then I'll resend it without the series notation.
> > But, this is basically a standalone patch.
>
> Ok, did you send the other ones already? I don't see them anywhere.
>
> NIT: Please don't top post. [1]
>
> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions