Re: [PATCH] soc: Use dev_fwnode()

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 08/07/2025 à 10:33, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le 11/06/2025 à 12:43, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) a écrit :
> > irq_domain_create_simple() takes fwnode as the first argument. It can be
> > extracted from the struct device using dev_fwnode() helper instead of
> > using of_node with of_fwnode_handle().
> >
> > So use the dev_fwnode() helper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> There must be something wrong with this patch. b4 shazam applies a 
> different patch.
>
> $ b4 shazam -l -s --single-message --no-parent 20250611104348.192092-19- 
> jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx
> Single-message mode, ignoring any follow-ups
> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20250611104348.192092-19- 
> jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx/t.mbox.gz
> Breaking thread to remove parents of 20250611104348.192092-19- 
> jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx
> Checking for newer revisions
> Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>    Added from v2: 1 patches
> Analyzing 25 messages in the thread
> Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org
> Analyzing 22 code-review messages
> Will use the latest revision: v2
> You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
>    ✓ [PATCH v2] iio: adc: stm32-adc: Use dev_fwnode()
>      + Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (✗ DKIM/ 
> baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com)
>      + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612084627.217341-1- 
> jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx
>      + Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>    ---
>    ✓ Signed: DKIM/kernel.org
> ---
> Total patches: 1
> ---
> Application de  iio: adc: stm32-adc: Use dev_fwnode()
>
> You must have posted another patch with the same message ID. I had to 
> apply it manually.

Applied (Manually), thanks!