Re: [PATCH] powerpc/qspinlock: Add spinlock contention tracepoint

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Wed Jul 30 2025 - 03:20:43 EST




Le 25/07/2025 à 10:14, Nysal Jan K.A. a écrit :
Add a lock contention tracepoint in the queued spinlock slowpath.
Also add the __lockfunc annotation so that in_lock_functions()
works as expected.

Signed-off-by: Nysal Jan K.A. <nysal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
index bcc7e4dff8c3..622e7f45c2ce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+#include <trace/events/lock.h>
#define MAX_NODES 4
@@ -708,8 +709,9 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
qnodesp->count--;
}
-void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock)
+void __lockfunc queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
+ trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN);
/*
* This looks funny, but it induces the compiler to inline both
* sides of the branch rather than share code as when the condition
@@ -718,16 +720,17 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && is_shared_processor()) {
if (try_to_steal_lock(lock, true)) {
spec_barrier();
- return;
+ } else {
+ queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, true);

If I read correctly, now all this is single line so you have to drop the braces , see https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces

}
- queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, true);
} else {
if (try_to_steal_lock(lock, false)) {
spec_barrier();
- return;
+ } else {
+ queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, false);
}

Same here.

- queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(lock, false);
}
+ trace_contention_end(lock, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);