Re: [PATCH net 1/3] dt-bindings: net: thead,th1520-gmac: Describe APB interface clock

From: Drew Fustini
Date: Tue Jul 29 2025 - 13:54:36 EST


On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:37:32AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> Besides ones for GMAC core and peripheral registers, the TH1520 GMAC
> requires one more clock for configuring APB glue registers. Describe
> it in the binding.
>
> Though the clock is essential for operation, it's not marked as required
> for now to avoid introducing new dt-binding warnings to existing dts.
>
> Fixes: f920ce04c399 ("dt-bindings: net: Add T-HEAD dwmac support")
> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/thead,th1520-gmac.yaml | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/thead,th1520-gmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/thead,th1520-gmac.yaml
> index 6d9de3303762..fea9fbc1d006 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/thead,th1520-gmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/thead,th1520-gmac.yaml
> @@ -59,14 +59,18 @@ properties:
> - const: apb
>
> clocks:
> + minItems: 2
> items:
> - description: GMAC main clock
> - description: Peripheral registers interface clock
> + - description: APB glue registers interface clock
>
> clock-names:
> + minItems: 2
> items:
> - const: stmmaceth
> - const: pclk
> + - const: apb
>
> interrupts:
> items:
> @@ -88,8 +92,8 @@ examples:
> compatible = "thead,th1520-gmac", "snps,dwmac-3.70a";
> reg = <0xe7070000 0x2000>, <0xec003000 0x1000>;
> reg-names = "dwmac", "apb";
> - clocks = <&clk 1>, <&clk 2>;
> - clock-names = "stmmaceth", "pclk";
> + clocks = <&clk 1>, <&clk 2>, <&clk 3>;
> + clock-names = "stmmaceth", "pclk", "apb";
> interrupts = <66>;
> interrupt-names = "macirq";
> phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> --
> 2.50.1
>

Thanks for figuring out that this clock is needed for the APB glue
registers. The schema passes W=1 dt_binding_check with no warnings.

Regarding minItems, I think it would be okay to change to 3 as the APB
clock should have been there from the start but I missed it. We can fix
the in-tree dts at the same time so that seems okay to me. But let's see
what the dt bindings maintainers think.

-Drew