Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/damon: Add damos_stat support for vaddr

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Tue Jul 29 2025 - 10:11:48 EST


On 29.07.25 15:53, Yueyang Pan wrote:
From: PanJason <pyyjason@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch adds support for damos_stat in virtual address space.
It leverages the walk_page_range to walk the page table and gets
the folio from page table. The last folio scanned is stored in
damos->last_applied to prevent double counting.
---
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index 87e825349bdf..3e319b51cfd4 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -890,6 +890,117 @@ static unsigned long damos_va_migrate(struct damon_target *target,
return applied * PAGE_SIZE;
}
+struct damos_va_stat_private {
+ struct damos *scheme;
+ unsigned long *sz_filter_passed;
+};
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+static int damos_va_stat_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+ struct damos_va_stat_private *priv = walk->private;
+ struct damos *s = priv->scheme;
+ unsigned long *sz_filter_passed = priv->sz_filter_passed;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ spinlock_t *ptl;
+ pmd_t pmde;
+
+ ptl = pmd_lock(walk->mm, pmd);
+ pmde = pmdp_get(pmd);
+
+ if (!pmd_present(pmde) || !pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ /* Tell page walk code to not split the PMD */
+ walk->action = ACTION_CONTINUE;
+
+ folio = damon_get_folio(pmd_pfn(pmde));
+ if (!folio)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ if (damon_invalid_damos_folio(folio, s))
+ goto update_last_applied;
+
+ if (!damos_va_filter_out(s, folio, walk->vma, addr, NULL, pmd)){
+ *sz_filter_passed += folio_size(folio);

See my comment below regarding vm_normal_page and folio references.

But this split into two handlers is fairly odd. Usually we only have a pmd_entry callback (see madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range as an example), and handle !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE in there.

Then, there is also no need to mess with ACTION_CONTINUE

+ }
+
+ folio_put(folio);
+update_last_applied:
+ s->last_applied = folio;
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+#define damon_va_stat_pmd_entry NULL
+#endif
+
+static int damos_va_stat_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+ struct damos_va_stat_private *priv = walk->private;
+ struct damos *s = priv->scheme;
+ unsigned long *sz_filter_passed = priv->sz_filter_passed;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ pte_t ptent;
+
+ ptent = ptep_get(pte);
+ if (pte_none(ptent) || !pte_present(ptent))
+ return 0;
+
+ folio = damon_get_folio(pte_pfn(ptent));
+ if (!folio)
+ return 0;

We have vm_normal_folio() and friends for a reason -- so you don't have to do pte_pfn() manually.

... and now I am confused. We are holding the PTL, so why would you have to grab+put a folio reference here *at all*.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb