Re: [PATCH v2] mm, page_pool: introduce a new page type for page pool in page type
From: Byungchul Park
Date: Tue Jul 29 2025 - 06:23:19 EST
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 10:22:30AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/29/25 02:19, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 07:36:54PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > > On 7/28/25 06:27, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > Changes from v1:
> > > > 1. Rebase on linux-next.
> > >
> > > net-next is closed, looks like until August 11.
> >
> > Worth noting, this is based on linux-next, not net-next :-)
>
> It doesn't matter, you're still sending it to be merged into
> the net tree. Please read
I'm sending it to be merged into *linux-next* tree since this's about
both mm and network.
However, if you are not talking about a specific tree to merge but you
are referring to 'Do not send *new* net-next *content* to netdev *during
the period*' in the link you shared, what should I do?
As for a network patch, I already tagged 'RFC net-next' as the guide:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250728042050.24228-1-byungchul@xxxxxx/
For a patch aiming at linux-next like this, what should I do? Should I
remove netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx from the reciever list? I'm not used to
this case.
Byungchul
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> Especially the "git-trees-and-patch-flow" section.
>
> --
> Pavel Begunkov