Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't register as a sched_clock on arm64

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Tue Jul 29 2025 - 05:13:51 EST


On 29/07/2025 10:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.

On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

[ ... ]

So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
it. Let me know if I got something wrong.

If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove
the following patches:

commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section
mismatch from the module conversion

Because of:

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2-
krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965-
aa05-05836466f81f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Grrr.

I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
pull and I revert them on top.

Also please reset your clockevents branch so next does not have the
conflicting SHAs

There is revert otherwise above [1]

Branch reset to v6.16-rc5

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog