Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types

[Sami Tolvanen]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 04:42:29PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> 
> With this patch set and no CONFIG_CFI_CLANG in .config,
> the bpf selftests work okay. In bpf ci, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG
> is not enabled.
> 
> But if enabling CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, this patch set fixed
> ./test_progs run issue, but there are some test failures
> like
> 
> ===
> test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000d581 - ffffffffa000d558 > 39
> processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
> #32/186  btf/line_info (No subprog):FAIL
> 
> test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000dee5 - ffffffffa000debc > 39
> processed 4 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
> #32/189  btf/line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info:FAIL
> 
> ...
> 
> test_get_linfo:FAIL:check jited_linfo[1]:ffffffffa000e069 - ffffffffa000e040 > 38
> processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0
> #32/202  btf/line_info (dead subprog + dead start w/ move):FAIL
> #32      btf:FAIL
> ===
> 
> The failure probably not related to this patch, but rather related
> to CONFIG_CFI_CLANG itself. I will debug this separately.

Agreed, that looks unrelated to this series.

Sami