Re: [PATCH 2/3] rust: maple_tree: add MapleTree::lock() and load()

From: Alice Ryhl
Date: Mon Jul 28 2025 - 07:19:57 EST


On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:11 PM Andrew Ballance
<andrewjballance@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7/26/25 8:23 AM, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > To load a value, one must be careful to hold the lock while accessing
> > it. To enable this, we add a lock() method so that you can perform
> > operations on the value before the spinlock is released.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I have a couple of nits, but overall looks good to me.
>
> > ---
> > rust/kernel/maple_tree.rs | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/maple_tree.rs b/rust/kernel/maple_tree.rs
> > index 0f26c173eedc7c79bb8e2b56fe85e8a266b3ae0c..c7ef504a9c78065b3d5752b4f5337fb6277182d1 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/maple_tree.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/maple_tree.rs
> > @@ -206,6 +206,23 @@ pub fn erase(&self, index: usize) -> Option<T> {
> > unsafe { T::try_from_foreign(ret) }
> > }
> >
> > + /// Lock the internal spinlock.
>
> probably should add #[must_use] here.
>
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn lock(&self) -> MapleLock<'_, T> {
> > + // SAFETY: It's safe to lock the spinlock in a maple tree.
> > + unsafe { bindings::spin_lock(self.ma_lock()) };
> > +
> > + // INVARIANT: We just took the spinlock.
> > + MapleLock(self)
> > + }
> > +
> > + #[inline]
> > + fn ma_lock(&self) -> *mut bindings::spinlock_t {
> > + // SAFETY: This pointer offset operation stays in-bounds.
> > + let lock = unsafe { &raw mut (*self.tree.get()).__bindgen_anon_1.ma_lock };
> > + lock.cast()
>
> This cast seems unneeded. lock should already be a *mut spinlock_t.

In some configurations, the type is BindgenUnionField<spinlock_t>.

Alice