[PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix typo "a entity" to "an entity" in comment

[Shou-Chi Chen]

Corrected a grammatical mistake in the comment of deadline.c,
changing "a entity" to "an entity" to conform with proper English usage.

Signed-off-by: Shou-Chi Chen <tuxsogi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 89019a140..bf06e5dfc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -848,20 +848,20 @@ static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 t);
 
 /*
  * Pure Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling does not deal with the
- * possibility of a entity lasting more than what it declared, and thus
+ * possibility of an entity lasting more than what it declared, and thus
  * exhausting its runtime.
  *
  * Here we are interested in making runtime overrun possible, but we do
- * not want a entity which is misbehaving to affect the scheduling of all
+ * not want an entity which is misbehaving to affect the scheduling of all
  * other entities.
  * Therefore, a budgeting strategy called Constant Bandwidth Server (CBS)
  * is used, in order to confine each entity within its own bandwidth.
  *
  * This function deals exactly with that, and ensures that when the runtime
- * of a entity is replenished, its deadline is also postponed. That ensures
+ * of an entity is replenished, its deadline is also postponed. That ensures
  * the overrunning entity can't interfere with other entity in the system and
  * can't make them miss their deadlines. Reasons why this kind of overruns
- * could happen are, typically, a entity voluntarily trying to overcome its
+ * could happen are, typically, an entity voluntarily trying to overcome its
  * runtime, or it just underestimated it during sched_setattr().
  */
 static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
-- 
2.43.0