Re: [RFC 0/2] Add AI coding assistant configuration to Linux kernel

[Sasha Levin]

On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 04:07:40AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > Example patch creation with Claude Code:
> >
> > 	$ claude -p "Fix the dont -> don't typo in @Documentation/power/opp.rst. Commit the result"
> > 	Done! The typo has been fixed and committed.
>
> Is this actually how people use AI agents?  I've never thought of 
> asking an agent to write a whole patch and commit the result.

Yup, there are a bunch of usecases for this, and while this is an
oversimplified example (that's why I picked a simple spelling fix that
the agent could get right "the first time").

See Kees' post at https://hachyderm.io/@kees/114907228284590439 , in
particular the buffer overflow fix where he logged his prompts.

> The way that I've seen it is things like Github Copilot within VScode 
> where there are inline suggestions.  It's kinda like clangd except it 
> suggests corrections to your mistakes instead of just underlining them 
> with red squiggles.
>
> Like if you messed up the argument and passed a pointer when it was 
> supposed to be a pointer to a pointer it will give you a little 
> tooltip correction.  But this is long before you would be ready to 
> actually commit a patch, heck it's before even testing it (obviously).
>
> The actual committing action would be by running 'git commit'.  So I 
> don't see how these tags could end up in there.

Even vscode has a commit feature which can help write commit
messages and actually commit them for you:
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/sourcecontrol/overview

But yes, if you choose to manually handle the committing aspect then you
should also be manually attributing the agent :)

--
Thanks,
Sasha