Re: [PATCH v7 28/31] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG

From: Reinette Chatre
Date: Fri Jul 25 2025 - 19:55:20 EST


Hi Tony,

On 7/11/25 4:53 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 1a6635cc5b37..1d07c38ed528 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -774,14 +774,26 @@ static int resctrl_arch_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>
> void resctrl_arch_pre_mount(void)
> {
> + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> static atomic_t only_once = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> - int old = 0;
> + int cpu, old = 0;
>
> if (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&only_once, &old, 1))
> return;
>
> if (!intel_aet_get_events())
> return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Late discovery of telemetry events means the domains for the
> + * resource were not built. Do that now.
> + */
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + mutex_lock(&domain_list_lock);
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> + domain_add_cpu_mon(cpu, r);

Without an explicit "mon_capable" check this change now creates a new "contract" that
"if intel_aet_get_events() succeeds then PERF_PKG is mon_capable". I do not believe this
additional complication justifies saving a line of code.

> + mutex_unlock(&domain_list_lock);
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> }
>
> enum {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> index 6958efbf7e81..ea7a782c1661 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ static int discover_events(struct event_group *e, struct pmt_feature_group *p)
> else
> r->num_rmid = e->num_rmids;
>
> + pr_info("%s %s monitoring detected\n", r->name, e->name);
> + r->mon_capable = true;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>

Reinette