Re: [PATCH v7 06/31] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function
From: Reinette Chatre
Date: Fri Jul 25 2025 - 19:22:40 EST
Hi Tony,
On 7/11/25 4:53 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
Missing context and problem description.
> To prepare for additional types of monitoring domains, move open coded L3
> resource monitoring domain initialization from domain_add_cpu_mon() into
> a new helper function l3_mon_domain_setup() called by domain_add_cpu_mon().
Please drop "function" that is unnecessary when using ().
(this highlights to consider my proposals critically as this confirms how easily
I too get it wrong)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
...
> +static void domain_add_cpu_mon(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + int id = get_domain_id_from_scope(cpu, r->mon_scope);
> + struct list_head *add_pos = NULL;
> + struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&domain_list_lock);
> +
> + if (id < 0) {
> + pr_warn_once("Can't find monitor domain id for CPU:%d scope:%d for resource %s\n",
> + cpu, r->mon_scope, r->name);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + hdr = resctrl_find_domain(&r->mon_domains, id, &add_pos);
> + if (hdr) {
> + if (!domain_header_is_valid(hdr, RESCTRL_MON_DOMAIN, r->rid))
> + return;
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &hdr->cpu_mask);
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + switch (r->rid) {
> + case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
> + l3_mon_domain_setup(cpu, id, r, add_pos);
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
Please add a "break". For consistency, when compared with the changes to
partner domain_remove_cpu_mon() in the next patch I'd vote for how the
default branch in domain_remove_cpu_mon() looks.
Reinette