Re: [PATCH 05/11] riscv: enable landing pad enforcement

From: Heinrich Schuchardt
Date: Fri Jul 25 2025 - 10:43:38 EST


On 25.07.25 16:20, Deepak Gupta wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 08:33:46AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 25.07.25 01:36, Deepak Gupta wrote:
Enables landing pad enforcement by invoking a SBI FWFT call.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c |  1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/head.S        | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm- offsets.c
index e4d55126dc3e..e6a9fad86fae 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
     DEFINE(SBI_EXT_FWFT, SBI_EXT_FWFT);
     DEFINE(SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET, SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET);
     DEFINE(SBI_FWFT_SHADOW_STACK, SBI_FWFT_SHADOW_STACK);
+    DEFINE(SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD, SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD);
     DEFINE(SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK, SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK);
 #endif
 }
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
index 9c99c5ad6fe8..59af044bf85c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
@@ -185,6 +185,16 @@ secondary_start_sbi:
 1:
 #endif
     scs_load_current
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI) && defined(CONFIG_RISCV_KERNEL_CFI)
+    li a7, SBI_EXT_FWFT
+    li a6, SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET
+    li a0, SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD
+    li a1, 1 /* enable landing pad for supervisor */
+    li a2, SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK
+    ecall    /* check for error condition and take appropriate action */
+#endif
+
     call smp_callin
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -359,6 +369,15 @@ SYM_CODE_START(_start_kernel)
 #endif
     scs_load_current
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI) && defined(CONFIG_RISCV_KERNEL_CFI)
+    li a7, SBI_EXT_FWFT
+    li a6, SBI_EXT_FWFT_SET
+    li a0, SBI_FWFT_LANDING_PAD
+    li a1, 1 /* enable landing pad for supervisor */

The SBI specification calls BIT(0) "LOCK".
Shouldn't we define a constant for the lock bit instead of using a magic value?

See below `li a2, SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK`.

"li a1, 1 /* enable landing pad for supervisor */>" --> this is enabling.
Had we done "li a1, 0 /* enable landing pad for supervisor */" --> this is
asking firmware to disable the feature (turn off the bit in menvcfg CSR)

So we lack constants for

"Enable landing pad for supervisor-mode"
"Disable landing pad for supervisor-mode"

Best regards

Heinrich


+    li a2, SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK
+    ecall    /* check for error condition and take appropriate action */
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
     call kasan_early_init
 #endif