Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm: Do not fault in device private pages owned by the caller
From: Mika Penttilä
Date: Thu Jul 24 2025 - 02:05:00 EST
On 7/24/25 08:57, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 08:46:11AM +0300, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>> On 7/24/25 08:02, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 10:25:11AM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>> On 7/23/25 05:34, Francois Dugast wrote:
>>>>> When the PMD swap entry is device private and owned by the caller,
>>>>> skip the range faulting and instead just set the correct HMM PFNs.
>>>>> This is similar to the logic for PTEs in hmm_vma_handle_pte().
>>>>>
>>>>> For now, each hmm_pfns[i] entry is populated as it is currently done
>>>>> in hmm_vma_handle_pmd() but this might not be necessary. A follow-up
>>>>> optimization could be to make use of the order and skip populating
>>>>> subsequent PFNs.
>>>> I think we should test and remove these now
>>>>
>>> +Jason, Leon – perhaps either of you can provide insight into why
>>> hmm_vma_handle_pmd fully populates the HMM PFNs when a higher-order page
>>> is found.
>>>
>>> If we can be assured that changing this won’t break other parts of the
>>> kernel, I agree it should be removed. A snippet of documentation should
>>> also be added indicating that when higher-order PFNs are found,
>>> subsequent PFNs within the range will remain unpopulated. I can verify
>>> that GPU SVM works just fine without these PFNs being populated.
>> afaics the device can consume the range as smaller pages also, and some
>> hmm users depend on that.
>>
> Sure, but I think that should be fixed in the device code. If a
> large-order PFN is found, the subsequent PFNs can clearly be inferred.
> It's a micro-optimization here, but devices or callers capable of
> handling this properly shouldn't force a hacky, less optimal behavior on
> core code. If anything relies on the current behavior, we should fix it
> and ensure correctness.
Yes sure device code can be changed but meant to say we can't just
delete those lines without breaking existing users.
>
> Matt
--Mika
>
>>> Matt
>>
>> --Mika
>>
>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/hmm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
>>>>> index f2415b4b2cdd..63ec1b18a656 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/hmm.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
>>>>> @@ -355,6 +355,31 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
>>>>> + swp_entry_t entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(pmd);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Don't fault in device private pages owned by the caller,
>>>>> + * just report the PFNs.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (is_device_private_entry(entry) &&
>>>>> + pfn_swap_entry_folio(entry)->pgmap->owner ==
>>>>> + range->dev_private_owner) {
>>>>> + unsigned long cpu_flags = HMM_PFN_VALID |
>>>>> + hmm_pfn_flags_order(PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>> + unsigned long pfn = swp_offset_pfn(entry);
>>>>> + unsigned long i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (is_writable_device_private_entry(entry))
>>>>> + cpu_flags |= HMM_PFN_WRITE;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, i++, pfn++) {
>>>>> + hmm_pfns[i] &= HMM_PFN_INOUT_FLAGS;
>>>>> + hmm_pfns[i] |= pfn | cpu_flags;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>> As discussed, can we remove these.
>>>>
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>> All of this be under CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (hmm_range_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, hmm_pfns, npages, 0))
>>>>> return -EFAULT;
>>>>> return hmm_pfns_fill(start, end, range, HMM_PFN_ERROR);
>>>>
>>>> Balbir Singh