Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add NVIDIA GB200-UT3.0b board

From: Donald Shannon
Date: Wed Jul 23 2025 - 17:58:28 EST


On 7/22/25 22:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 23/07/2025 03:42, Donald Shannon wrote:
This is an Aspeed AST2600 based unit testing platform for GB200.
UT3.0b is different than nvidia-gb200nvl-bmc due to networking topology
differences, additional gpio expanders, and voltage regulator gating
some devices.

Reference to Ast2600 SOC [1].
Reference to Blackwell GB200NVL Platform [2].

Link: https://www.aspeedtech.com/server_ast2600/ [1]
Link: https://nvdam.widen.net/s/wwnsxrhm2w/blackwell-datasheet-3384703 [2]
Signed-off-by: Donald Shannon <donalds@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Why are you faking tags? No, you cannot just add whatever you want.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

I think I was confused by your message on my V5 patch. I will remove the Acked-by and resubmit:

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

With above two:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>


<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review
tags are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely
(please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you
do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...').
However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
apply.

Thanks,
Donald