RE: [PATCH 0/2] cpupower: Allow control of boost feature on non-x86 based systems with boost support.

From: Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2025 - 03:39:44 EST


Hi, John and Shuah

Regarding the subject, I submitted patches to cpupower, but so far I haven't received confirmation that the content has been approved, nor does it appear to have been merged into the shuah/linux.git master branch.
Could you please inform me about the current status of the patches?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

----
Shinji Nomoto

-----Original Message-----
From: John B. Wyatt IV <jwyatt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2025 2:27 AM
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nomoto, Shinji/野本 真二 <fj5851bi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxxx>; Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>; John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpupower: Allow control of boost feature on non-x86 based systems with boost support.

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 03:54:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/3/25 01:16, Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > John Wyatt wrote:
> > > Did you test this on non-x86 systems? If so, would you please provide details on those architectures and systems?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch has been tested on Arm-based systems.
> >
> > * It was tested on our internal simulator based on QEMU which supports boost.
> > * It was tested on the Nvidia grace system (which does not support boost).
> > * The cppc_cpufreq driver is working on both of the above systems.
> >
> > We have also confirmed that it continues to work as expected on AMD systems.
> >
>
> John,
>
> Let me know if you are good with this testing details.

I have not tested it, but I the testing details are fine.

--
Sincerely,
John Wyatt
Software Engineer, Core Kernel
Red Hat