Re: [PATCH 2/4] rust: io_uring: introduce rust abstraction for io-uring cmd

From: Sidong Yang
Date: Mon Jul 21 2025 - 01:23:27 EST


On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 03:10:28PM -0400, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 10:34 AM Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch introduces rust abstraction for io-uring sqe, cmd. IoUringSqe
> > abstracts io_uring_sqe and it has cmd_data(). and IoUringCmd is
> > abstraction for io_uring_cmd. From this, user can get cmd_op, flags,
> > pdu and also sqe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > rust/kernel/io_uring.rs | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > rust/kernel/lib.rs | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 rust/kernel/io_uring.rs
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/io_uring.rs b/rust/kernel/io_uring.rs
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..7843effbedb4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/io_uring.rs
> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +// Copyright (C) 2025 Furiosa AI.
> > +
> > +//! Files and file descriptors.
> > +//!
> > +//! C headers: [`include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h`](srctree/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h) and
> > +//! [`include/linux/file.h`](srctree/include/linux/file.h)
> > +
> > +use core::mem::MaybeUninit;
> > +
> > +use crate::{fs::File, types::Opaque};
> > +
> > +pub mod flags {
> > + pub const COMPLETE_DEFER: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_COMPLETE_DEFER;
> > + pub const UNLOCKED: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED;
> > +
> > + pub const MULTISHOT: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_MULTISHOT;
> > + pub const IOWQ: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_IOWQ;
> > + pub const NONBLOCK: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK;
> > +
> > + pub const SQE128: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_SQE128;
> > + pub const CQE32: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_CQE32;
> > + pub const IOPOLL: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_IOPOLL;
> > +
> > + pub const CANCEL: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_CANCEL;
> > + pub const COMPAT: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_COMPAT;
> > + pub const TASK_DEAD: i32 = bindings::io_uring_cmd_flags_IO_URING_F_TASK_DEAD;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > +pub struct IoUringCmd {
> > + inner: Opaque<bindings::io_uring_cmd>,
> > +}
> > +
> > +impl IoUringCmd {
> > + /// Returns the cmd_op with associated with the io_uring_cmd.
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn cmd_op(&self) -> u32 {
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + unsafe { (*self.inner.get()).cmd_op }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Returns the flags with associated with the io_uring_cmd.
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn flags(&self) -> u32 {
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + unsafe { (*self.inner.get()).flags }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Returns the ref pdu for free use.
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn pdu(&mut self) -> MaybeUninit<&mut [u8; 32]> {
>
> Should be &mut MaybeUninit, right? It's the bytes that may be
> uninitialized, not the reference.

Yes, it should be &mut MaybeUninit.
>
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + unsafe { MaybeUninit::new(&mut (*self.inner.get()).pdu) }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /// Constructs a new `struct io_uring_cmd` wrapper from a file descriptor.
>
> Why "from a file descriptor"?
>
> Also, missing a comment documenting the safety preconditions?

Yes, it's a mistake in comment and also ptr should be NonNull.
>
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *const bindings::io_uring_cmd) -> &'a IoUringCmd {
>
> Could take NonNull instead of a raw pointer.
>
> > + // SAFETY: The caller guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid for the
> > + // duration of 'a. The cast is okay because `File` is `repr(transparent)`.
>
> "File" -> "IoUringCmd"?
>
> > + unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
> > + }
> > +
> > + // Returns the file that referenced by uring cmd self.
>
> I had a hard time parsing this comment. How about "Returns a reference
> to the uring cmd's file object"?

Agreed. thanks.
>
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn file<'a>(&'a self) -> &'a File {
>
> Could elide the lifetime.

Thanks, I didn't know about this.
>
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + let file = unsafe { (*self.inner.get()).file };
> > + unsafe { File::from_raw_file(file) }
>
> Missing a SAFETY comment for File::from_raw_file()? I would expect
> something about io_uring_cmd's file field storing a non-null pointer
> to a struct file on which a reference is held for the duration of the
> uring cmd.

Yes, I missed. thanks.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + // Returns the sqe that referenced by uring cmd self.
>
> "Returns a reference to the uring cmd's SQE"?

Agreed, thanks.
>
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn sqe(&self) -> &IoUringSqe {
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + let ptr = unsafe { (*self.inner.get()).sqe };
>
> "ptr" isn't very descriptive. How about "sqe"?

Sounds good.
>
> > + unsafe { IoUringSqe::from_raw(ptr) }
>
> Similar, missing SAFETY comment for IoUringSqe::from_raw()?

Thanks. I missed.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + // Called by consumers of io_uring_cmd, if they originally returned -EIOCBQUEUED upon receiving the command
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub fn done(self, ret: isize, res2: u64, issue_flags: u32) {
>
> I don't think it's safe to move io_uring_cmd. io_uring_cmd_done(), for
> example, calls cmd_to_io_kiocb() to turn struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd
> into struct io_kiocb *req via a pointer cast. And struct io_kiocb's
> definitely need to be pinned in memory. For example,
> io_req_normal_work_add() inserts the struct io_kiocb into a linked
> list. Probably some sort of pinning is necessary for IoUringCmd.

Understood, Normally the users wouldn't create IoUringCmd than use borrowed cmd
in uring_cmd() callback. How about change to &mut self and also uring_cmd provides
&mut IoUringCmd for arg.

>
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + unsafe {
> > + bindings::io_uring_cmd_done(self.inner.get(), ret, res2, issue_flags);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +#[repr(transparent)]
> > +pub struct IoUringSqe {
> > + inner: Opaque<bindings::io_uring_sqe>,
> > +}
> > +
> > +impl<'a> IoUringSqe {
> > + pub fn cmd_data(&'a self) -> &'a [Opaque<u8>] {
> > + // SAFETY: The call guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid
> > + unsafe {
> > + let cmd = (*self.inner.get()).__bindgen_anon_6.cmd.as_ref();
> > + core::slice::from_raw_parts(cmd.as_ptr() as *const Opaque<u8>, 8)
>
> Why 8? Should be 16 bytes for a 64-byte SQE and 80 bytes for a
> 128-byte SQE, right?

Yes, it should be 16 bytes or 80 bytes. I'll fix this.

>
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + #[inline]
> > + pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *const bindings::io_uring_sqe) -> &'a IoUringSqe {
>
> Take NonNull here too?

Yes, Thanks.
>
> > + // SAFETY: The caller guarantees that the pointer is not dangling and stays valid for the
> > + // duration of 'a. The cast is okay because `File` is `repr(transparent)`.
> > + //
> > + // INVARIANT: The caller guarantees that there are no problematic `fdget_pos` calls.
>
> Why "File" and "fdget_pos"?

It's a bad mistake. thanks!

Thank you so much for deatiled review!

Thanks,
Sidong
>
> Best,
> Caleb
>
> > + unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
> > + }
> > +}
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > index 6b4774b2b1c3..fb310e78d51d 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
> > pub mod fs;
> > pub mod init;
> > pub mod io;
> > +pub mod io_uring;
> > pub mod ioctl;
> > pub mod jump_label;
> > #[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >