Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: Switch to msi_create_parent_irq_domain()

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Jul 18 2025 - 15:09:06 EST


On Tue, Jul 15 2025 at 12:09, Nuno Das Neves wrote:
> On 7/9/2025 4:40 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> CC Nuno who is also touching on this file.
>>
>> Nam, thanks for this patch.
>>
>> Nuno's patches fix a few bugs with the current implementation. I expect
>> those patches to have contextual conflicts with this patch. I would like
>> to commit Nuno's patches first since those are bug fixes, and then
>> circle back to this one.
>>
>> Nuno, can you please review this patch?
>>
>
> I don't think I can give a Reviewed-by since I don't have the context
> for these changes.

The cover letter provides the information along with a link for deeper
information:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1751277765.git.namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> It doesn't look like this conflicts with the changes in my patches.

It might not look like it, but reality tells a different story:

Applying patch _PATCH_v2_2_2_x86_hyperv_Switch_to_msi_create_parent_irq_domain_.patch
patching file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 276.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c
patching file drivers/hv/Kconfig
Hunk #1 FAILED at 10.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/hv/Kconfig

Nam, can you please redo the patch against the hyperv tree?

Thanks,

tglx