Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code.
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu Jul 17 2025 - 15:23:18 EST
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:45:13AM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Since we no longer need to make new_folio->index >= end work for anon
> >> folios, can we drop the end = -1 in the if (is_anon) { ... } branch?
> >
> > Sure.
>
> A second thought on this one. If I remove end = -1, can static analysis
> tools understand that end is not used when a folio is anonymous?
> Probably, I can initialize end to -1 and remove end = -1 in is_anon
> branch.
Smatch says that "if "mapping" is non-NULL then "end" is initialized"
and it doesn't trigger a warning. I don't know how the other checkers
handle it.
Btw, the only thing you really have to pay attention to is Clang because
we treat build warnings as failure. You're always free to ignore other
checkers.
regards,
dan carpenter