Re: [PATCH net-next V2 0/3] in order support for vhost-net

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 02:01:06PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This
> > > > > feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by
> > > > > optimizing descriptor processing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details.
> > > >
> > > > You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply
> > > > for us in the current form.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Will rebase and send a new version.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in
> > linux-next, without noticing the tag).
> 
> I think that's also fine.
> 
> Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future?
> 
> (Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP
> GSO feature merged).

Whatever is easier really. Generally I do core vhost but if there is a
conflict we can do net-next.

> >
> > But I also guess guest bits should be merged in the same cycle
> > as host bits, less confusion.
> 
> Work for me, I will post guest bits.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> >
> > --
> > MST
> >