Re: [PATCH v5 15/22] objtool: Add action to check for absence of absolute relocations

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Wed Jul 16 2025 - 06:27:23 EST


On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 19:54, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 05:18:30AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > index d967ac001498..5d1d38404892 100644
> > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > @@ -4643,6 +4643,39 @@ static void disas_warned_funcs(struct objtool_file *file)
> > disas_funcs(funcs);
> > }
> >
> > +static int check_abs_references(struct objtool_file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct section *sec;
> > + struct reloc *reloc;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_sec(file, sec) {
> > + /* absolute references in non-loadable sections are fine */
> > + if (!(sec->sh.sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* section must have an associated .rela section */
> > + if (!sec->rsec)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Special case for compiler generated metadata that is not
> > + * consumed until after boot.
> > + */
> > + if (!strcmp(sec->name, "__patchable_function_entries"))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + for_each_reloc(sec->rsec, reloc) {
> > + if (reloc_type(reloc) == R_ABS64) {
>
> This should probably also check R_ABS32. Yes, your current only user is
> x86_64 so R_ABS64 covers things, but we're getting more and more archs
> using objtool. No reason this check shouldn't also work on PPC32 for
> example.
>

Yeah, I was unsure about this.

This check is sufficient to ensure that PIC code is not emitted with,
e.g., global variables with absolute addresses, etc. So the R_ABS64
check here is only a check whether any relocations of the native
pointer size are present (but no R_ABS_NATIVE exists at this point)

For robustness, we should actually check for all absolute relocations
here, including R_X86_64_32S, which is not abstracted into a R_ABSxx
type for objtool.

So perhaps this needs an arch hook where x86_64 can implement it as

bool arch_is_abs_reloc(reloc)
{
switch (reloc_type(reloc)) {
case R_X86_64_32:
case R_X86_64_32S:
case R_X86_64_64:
return true;
}
return false;
}

and the default just compares against R_ABS32 / R_ABS64 depending on
the word size?