Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add KSZ8463 switch support to KSZ DSA driver

[Andrew Lunn]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 07:01:55PM -0700, Tristram.Ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha <tristram.ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> KSZ8463 switch is a 3-port switch based from KSZ8863.  Its major
> difference from other KSZ SPI switches is its register access is not a
> simple continual 8-bit transfer with automatic address increase but uses
> a byte-enable mechanism specifying 8-bit, 16-bit, or 32-bit access.  Its
> registers are also defined in 16-bit format because it shares a design
> with a MAC controller using 16-bit access.  As a result some common
> register accesses need to be re-arranged.  The 64-bit access used by
> other switches needs to be broken into 2 32-bit accesses.

This is a rather large patch, making it hard to review. Please could
you break it up into smaller patches, with good commit messages.

>  static void ksz_cfg(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 addr, u8 bits, bool set)
>  {
> -	regmap_update_bits(ksz_regmap_8(dev), addr, bits, set ? bits : 0);
> +	regmap_update_bits(ksz_regmap_8(dev), reg8(dev, addr), bits,
> +			   set ? bits : 0);
>  }

This pattern of using reg8() appears a few times. That could be one
patch.

>  
>  static void ksz_port_cfg(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, int offset, u8 bits,
>  			 bool set)
>  {
> -	regmap_update_bits(ksz_regmap_8(dev), PORT_CTRL_ADDR(port, offset),
> +	regmap_update_bits(ksz_regmap_8(dev),
> +			   reg8(dev, dev->dev_ops->get_port_addr(port, offset)),
>  			   bits, set ? bits : 0);

Adding this helper and using it could be a patch.


> -	if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev))
> +	if (ksz_is_ksz88x3(dev) || ksz_is_ksz8463(dev))
>  		return -ENOTSUPP;

All these ENOTSUPP could be a patch.

etc.


    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr