Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Clean code with bpf_copy_to_user

From: Tao Chen
Date: Thu Jul 03 2025 - 12:20:03 EST


在 2025/7/4 00:14, Yonghong Song 写道:


On 7/3/25 9:03 AM, Tao Chen wrote:
在 2025/7/3 23:35, Yonghong Song 写道:


On 7/3/25 5:43 AM, Tao Chen wrote:
No logic change, just use bpf_copy_to_user to clean code.

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 17 +++--------------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index e6eea594f1c..ca152d36312 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -5208,21 +5208,10 @@ static int bpf_task_fd_query_copy(const union bpf_attr *attr,
              if (put_user(zero, ubuf))
                  return -EFAULT;
-        } else if (input_len >= len + 1) {
-            /* ubuf can hold the string with NULL terminator */
-            if (copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, len + 1))
-                return -EFAULT;
          } else {
-            /* ubuf cannot hold the string with NULL terminator,
-             * do a partial copy with NULL terminator.
-             */
-            char zero = '\0';
-
-            err = -ENOSPC;
-            if (copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, input_len - 1))
-                return -EFAULT;
-            if (put_user(zero, ubuf + input_len - 1))
-                return -EFAULT;
+            err = bpf_copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, input_len, len);
+            if (err)
+                return err;
          }
      }

Actually, there is a return value change with this patch.
bpf_copy_to_user() return returns -ENOSPC while the original
implementation may return -EFAULT due to following code.

         if (put_user(prog_id, &uattr->task_fd_query.prog_id) ||
             put_user(fd_type, &uattr->task_fd_query.fd_type) ||
             put_user(probe_offset, &uattr- >task_fd_query.probe_offset) ||
             put_user(probe_addr, &uattr->task_fd_query.probe_addr))
                 return -EFAULT;

         return err;


You are right, maybe we can just use:
    err = bpf_copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, input_len, len);
and no return check
or move these put_user code to the front.

Maybe do the following?

   err = bpf_copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, input_len, len);
   if (err && err != -ENOSPC)
     return err;


Well, it looks better, i will change it in v2, thanks.

--
Best Regards
Tao Chen