Re: [PATCH v2] khugepaged: Reduce race probability between migration and khugepaged

From: Dev Jain
Date: Thu Jul 03 2025 - 05:53:45 EST



On 03/07/25 2:55 pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.07.25 07:48, Dev Jain wrote:
Suppose a folio is under migration, and khugepaged is also trying to
collapse it. collapse_pte_mapped_thp() will retrieve the folio from the
page cache via filemap_lock_folio(), thus taking a reference on the folio
and sleeping on the folio lock, since the lock is held by the migration
path. Migration will then fail in
__folio_migrate_mapping -> folio_ref_freeze. Reduce the probability of
such a race happening (leading to migration failure) by bailing out
if we detect a PMD is marked with a migration entry.

This fixes the migration-shared-anon-thp testcase failure on Apple M3.

Note that, this is not a "fix" since it only reduces the chance of
interference of khugepaged with migration, wherein both the kernel
functionalities are deemed "best-effort".

Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>
---

v1->v2:
  - Remove SCAN_PMD_MIGRATION, merge into SCAN_PMD_MAPPED (David, Anshuman)
  - Add a comment (Lorenzo)

v1:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250630044837.4675-1-dev.jain@xxxxxxx/

  mm/khugepaged.c | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 1aa7ca67c756..3fdefc4f4984 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -941,6 +941,15 @@ static inline int check_pmd_state(pmd_t *pmd)
        if (pmd_none(pmde))
          return SCAN_PMD_NONE;
+
+    /*
+     * The folio may be under migration when khugepaged is trying to
+     * collapse it. Migration success or failure will eventually end
+     * up with the PMD still pointing to a PMD-order folio, so return
+     * SCAN_PMD_MAPPED.

Nit: the last part (, so return ..) is obvious from the code.

I would have written

/*
 * The folio may be under migration when khugepaged is trying to
 * collapse it. Migration success or failure will eventually end
 * up with a present PMD entry again.
 */

Thanks for the suggestion, but

PMD pointing to PMD-order folio necessarily implies present PMD entry,

but the converse is not true? For example it may point to a PTE table.

So I wanted to make it explicitly clear that the transient entry will be

converted to a PMD-THP in the end.



Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!