Re: [PATCH v12 00/11] perf: Support the deferred unwinding infrastructure

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:04:10 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Josh Poimboeuf (5):
>       perf: Remove get_perf_callchain() init_nr argument
>       perf: Have get_perf_callchain() return NULL if crosstask and user are set
>       perf: Simplify get_perf_callchain() user logic
>       perf: Skip user unwind if the task is a kernel thread
>       perf: Support deferred user callchains
> 
> Namhyung Kim (4):
>       perf tools: Minimal CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED support
>       perf record: Enable defer_callchain for user callchains
>       perf script: Display PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN_DEFERRED
>       perf tools: Merge deferred user callchains
> 
> Steven Rostedt (2):
>       perf: Use current->flags & PF_KTHREAD|PF_USER_WORKER instead of current->mm == NULL
>       perf: Support deferred user callchains for per CPU events

Hmm, patches 5-11 seemed to be dropped, and I sent out 12 patches of
the latest sframe work that I can't find anywhere. I think my ISP is
thinking I'm spamming so it dropped the emails. That's all I can figure.

I originally used kernel.org as my smtp server, but gmail starting
putting my emails into spam because kernel.org can't validate
goodmis.org with DKIM (my DNS has kernel.org set for SPF, but that's
not enough these days :-p).

So I went back to my ISP (hover.com) as my SMTP server, but now I think
it doesn't like my scripts that sends out a series of patches to a lot
of people. It likely thinks I'm a spam bot (although maybe I am!).

I guess I'll change my scripts to use rostedt@xxxxxxxxxx to send and go
back to using kernel.org as the SMTP server for my scripts. :-/

Expect a resend. Sorry for all the noise.

-- Steve