Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] rust: revocable: documentation and refactorings

[Marcelo Moreira]

Em ter., 1 de jul. de 2025 às 08:40, Danilo Krummrich
<dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:27:17PM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 6:59 PM Marcelo Moreira
> > <marcelomoreira1905@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch series brings documentation and refactorings to the `Revocable` type.
> > >
> > > Changes include:
> > > - Clarifying the write invariant and updating associated safety comments for `Revocable<T>`.
> > > - Splitting the internal `revoke_internal` function into two distinct, explicit functions: `revoke()` (safe, synchronizing with RCU) and `revoke_nosync()` (unsafe, without RCU synchronization), now returning `bool` to indicate revocation status.
> > >
> > > Marcelo Moreira (2):
> > >   rust: revocable: Refactor revocation mechanism to remove generic
> > >     revoke_internal
> > >   rust: revocable: Clarify write invariant and update safety comments
> >
> > Danilo, did you have Revocable / Devres changes that conflict with this?
>
> Yes, but I sent them to Linus for -rc3 already. Given that rust-next is based on
> -rc3, we should be good. There shouldn't be any further conflicts.

Hi guys!

I resolved the conflicts. I hope it is the way you expected.

-- 
Cheers,
Marcelo Moreira