Re: [PATCH V6 7/7] Introduce a config option for scheduler time slice extension feature

From: K Prateek Nayak
Date: Mon Jun 30 2025 - 23:13:04 EST


Hello Prakash,

Couple of nits. inlined below.

On 7/1/2025 6:07 AM, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
Add a config option to enable schedule time slice extension.

Signed-off-by: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/entry-common.h | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++----
init/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
kernel/rseq.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++------
kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 3 ++-
7 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
index d4fa952e394e..351c9dc159bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __always_inline void syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs)
CT_WARN_ON(ct_state() != CT_STATE_KERNEL);
/* reschedule if sched delay was granted */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSEQ) && current->sched_time_delay)
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_PREEMPT_DELAY) && current->sched_time_delay)

A wrapper around this would be nice. Something like
sched_delay_resched()? It can also be reused in do_sched_yield() then.
Thoughts?

set_tsk_need_resched(current);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {

[..snip..]

diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index ce76e913aa2b..2f5f603d175a 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -1130,6 +1130,13 @@ config SCHED_MM_CID
def_bool y
depends on SMP && RSEQ
+config SCHED_PREEMPT_DELAY
+ def_bool y
+ depends on SMP && RSEQ

&& SCHED_HRTICK

and then you can avoid the ugly "!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK)"
checks and keep all the SCHED_PREEMPT_DELAY bits in one place
without the need to put them in the "#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK"
block.

Also, are we settling for 30us delay for PREEMPT_RT too or should
this also include "&& !PREEMPT_RT"?

+ help
+ This feature enables a thread to request extending its time slice on
+ the cpu by delaying preemption.
+
config UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP
bool "Utilization clamping per group of tasks"
depends on CGROUP_SCHED

--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek