Re: [PATCH RFC] pci: report surprise removal events

[Keith Busch]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 01:52:26PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > 
> > But I didn't suggest calling error_detected from report_error_detected.
> > Just call it directly without device_lock. It's not very feasible to enforce a non-
> > blocking callback, though, if speed is really a concern here.
> Yeah, it would better to either always call a callback with or without the lock.
> In some flows with lock and in some flows without lock would likely be
> very bad as one cannot establish a sane locking order.

On closer look, my suggestion without the device_lock may be racy, but
using the device_lock prevents the notification that needs to happen.
Hm, not as easy as I thought. :(